Candidate Response - Lynn Rosko
Friday, August 31st, 2007Candidate Information:
District: 3
Name: Lynn Rosko
Occupation: Citizen Advocate/ Homemaker
Website: www.lynnrosko4council.com
Email:lynnroskoforcouncil@comcast.net
Phone: 540-3282
What is your vision for the City of Cape Coral? What will the city look like after your first full term in office?
My vision for Cape Coral is that of a beautiful quality suburban City. It is more important that we have quality residential development rather than just a large volume or quantity of low value residential development. If we add housing below our mean average we will pay higher taxes. We are a pre-platted community and do not have an airport, deep harbor, rail line or a major highway or interstate. We will not be able to have an urban tax base of 25 to 30 percent commercial and light industrial and therefore will be heavily reliant on our residential tax base.
We have, however, amenities with our 400 miles of canals and waterfront property that are second to none. We therefore can have growth of good residential property values that will not burden existing residents.
What do you see as the largest challenges facing the city? What are your plans for addressing these challenges?
The largest challenge is providing the necessary infrastructure for our City’s future growth and development at a reasonable cost basis. Our municipal utility system, roads and public service buildings and facilities can and must be obtained at a reasonable cost. Long range planning is essential. The present high cost management at risk contracting must end.
What are your plans for controlling the costs of government services, assessments, taxes and fees to our citizens and businesses?
Cape Coral has many highly qualified professional and business people. I will seek input from them and not from committees of acquaintances and political friends. We must also amend our Charter to control the rate of public spending for general government operations. Today in budgeting we understate our anticipated revenues and overstate our expenses to ensure that there will be adequate monies to support out budget. There is nothing wrong with that approach. What is wrong is what we do with the surplus money it provides. Instead of it being held and applied to the following year’s budget to reduce taxes, it is being spent. Former Mayor Kempe proposed a Charter Amendment to require that it be held and applied to the following year’s budget except for an emergency appropriation and would generally save six percent of our general fund budget of $160 million or almost $10 million annually. His other Charter proposal was to require a 2/3 vote of the City Council to increase the general fund budget at a rate that exceeds the combined rate of growth and inflation. Both of these proposed amendments were kept away from the voters by a 4 to 4 vote of the City Council. I would be supportive of those measures going to the voters for their Vote.
What are your plans for improving the economic situation and general appeal of our city for current and future residents and businesses?
The annexation of approximately 3 square miles of the Zemel and other properties along our northern boundary will provide for Commercial and light industrial development which will help our property tax base and provided jobs.
We must also use strict code enforcement to keep our City attractive. Controlling City spending is essential not only for our residents but for attraction of prospective business.
What are your plans for using new communication and business tools provided over the Internet for residents and businesses to contact you, or for you to share your ongoing work with residents?
Increased public input by communication with the City Council and the City Administration is both beneficial and desirable. I want to see the maximum use of all technology between City government itself and with its citizens.